Sunday, March 2, 2014

Thesis and Outline

The question to write this term paper about I chose was to truly dig into why Raskolnikov killed Lizaveta and Alianova, why he considered himself a “hero” with this action yet still regretted it and feared his actions as well, and why he proved to have a good heart by committing good deeds. This essay will go into studying the psychology behind a person like Raskolnikov, so it will not only be about Crime and Punishment, but also how another human being would act and react in a situation like Raskolnikov’s. It is going to study exactly what let him to committing the crime, including nature and nurture, selfishness, heroism, poverty, insanity, reasons and how those reasons are relative in psychology — it is going to also observe if psychology can truly have an explanation for Raskolnikov’s actions, if he is truly a sociopath.

The Thesis statement will be:

Raskolnikov, having been raised in very rough, violent, and poor conditions, did consider himself a hero by “eliminating” Alianova and Lizaveta from life, essentially, yet he regretted and feared the consequences because there is a very humane side to him which knew, morally, it was not the correct choice and knew that there would be grave consequences to face after murdering two innocent women. 

Outline: 
I. Introduction
    A. Dostoevsky
          1.time period/setting in which the book was written
              i. Czar Alexander II
              ii. St. Petersburg
              iii. 1865
          2.brief background on Dostoevsky
              i. he was in the military
              ii. he was exiled to siberia
              iii. first two parts of C+P were published in Jan and Feb of 1866 in a periodical called "The Russian Messenger"
    B. Psychology Aspects
          1. Freud
              i. consciousness
              ii. Freudian slips
          2. Psychology experiments testing sociopaths
          3.  Dostoevsky's own discussion about the dark thoughts within us
    C. Thesis (above)
II. First Body Paragraph
    A. Setting of Crime and Punishment (above)
    B. About Raskolnikov
         1. Hint at the fact that he is a borderline sociopath
         2. Hint at the good deeds he’s done
    C. Introduce characters
          1. Alionova
          2. Lizaveta
          3. Razhumikin
          4. Pulcheria
          5. Dounia
          6. Sonia
III. Raskolnikov
   A. His past
       i. he grew up in wretched, rough, violent living conditions
   B. His thoughts — what leads him to Aliona (Freud)
   C. his current living conditions
       i. he lives in a tiny apartment which is disgustingly dirty and he sleeps in his clothes
   D. his friends
   E. His relationship with his mom and sister
       i. Dunia's problems with Luzhin added to his insanity
   F. His crime
       i. he intended to just kill Alionova but ends up killing a second innocent woman, Lizaveta
   G. the good deeds he’s done
       i. He gave Marmeladov his money when he saw how desperately he needed it
       ii. He tried to save the young drunk prostitute from the guy trying to violate her
IV. Psychology and Raskolnikov
   A. Freud
   B. experiments
   C. sociopaths and their reasonings
   D. how other people who committed murder reacted to the initial action and, after, the consequences
   E. poverty, selfishness
   F. nature and nurture
       i. did the atmosphere around him influence his extreme thoughts and actions or was it his own instinct to react that way?
   G. is he insane?
   H. Superiority complex
       i. he thinks he is better than all those around him
       ii. that superiority leads him to compare Alionova with someone like him, and in his mind, compared to himself, she was so worthless she did not deserve to live
V. Does he consider himself a hero?
   A. Yes, he does
        i. he considers himself a hero because he feels like he was doing the world around him a favor by eliminating people like                                   Alionova from the surroundings. he did not believe people like her deserved to live.
        ii. this kind of reasoning from him goes back to NFTU, when Dostoevsky discussed that once someone reached a certain point, he/she could not do any more, so he/she had to be "removed"
   B. Reasons why this action was contradictory to his humane good deeds
       i. He proves to have a good heart when he performs deeds such as leaving money for a stranger he just met because he saw he (Marmeladov) was in need
      ii. He tries to save a young drunk girl who was about to get raped by an old man
VI. Why did he do it if he knew the consequences? 
    A. Reasons behind his murder
    B. “Hero”
    C. Reasons why he fears the consequences

No comments:

Post a Comment